Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2019-10-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/linsmith/discussion/389360/thread/bb8a6d356f/ On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 16:50, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Le 20/07/19 à 16:45, Graham Inggs a écrit : > > Does not removing the package now cause any problems? > No, that can still wait a bit If linsmi

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2019-07-20 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 20/07/19 à 16:45, Graham Inggs a écrit : Hi Laurent Hello Graham, On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 14:42, Laurent Bigonville wrote: If nobody has any plans to work on this, I'll request to remove the package from the archive then? Any objections about this? Last I read, upstream is still working o

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2019-07-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Laurent On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 14:42, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > If nobody has any plans to work on this, I'll request to remove the > package from the archive then? Any objections about this? Last I read, upstream is still working on this. Does not removing the package now cause any proble

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2019-07-20 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:46:01 +0200 Yavor Doganov wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:24:00 +0200, > Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > We'd like to remove those libraries soon, but I am willing to wait a > > bit longer for someone to port linsmith to gtk3. > > JFTR, I don't intend to work on this package. I don

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2019-01-12 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:24:00 +0200, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > We'd like to remove those libraries soon, but I am willing to wait a > bit longer for someone to port linsmith to gtk3. JFTR, I don't intend to work on this package. I don't have time at the moment, but more importantly I don't have the mo

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2019-01-08 Thread Jeremy Bicha
linsmith is now the last package keeping several libgnome libraries in Debian Unstable. [1] We'd like to remove those libraries soon, but I am willing to wait a bit longer for someone to port linsmith to gtk3. Note that the Debian Release Team requires your package to reach Testing by February 12

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2018-11-21 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:23 AM Graham Inggs wrote: > Is there a RFA bug for libgnome? Perhaps someone would like to adopt it > in order to prevent the removal of working software from Debian. I am sorry for the inconvenience. The list of packages using libgnome is so small now (basically it's

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2018-11-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Jeremy On 2018/11/19 14:13, Jeremy Bicha wrote: I don't know if you saw this bug and Yavor's response at https://bugs.debian.org/885742 Yes, I forwarded this bug to John (upstream) by email on January 4. I didn't get a reply, but as per the discussion on sourceforge, which Yavor linked, Jo

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2018-11-19 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Graham, I don't know if you saw this bug and Yavor's response at https://bugs.debian.org/885742 Are you interested in talking to upstream about getting access to the gtk3 port of linsmith? linsmith is one of the last packages using libgnome in Debian and the Debian GNOME would really like to get

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2018-08-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
I started working on this bug but fortunately discovered fairly quickly that upstream is on the way of moving to GTK+ 3: https://sourceforge.net/p/linsmith/discussion/389360/thread/90b515fb/#01e5/f302 You might want to check the status, it would be a pity if this package has to be removed for bus