Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On 01/03/18 11:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:21:44 + James Cowgill wrote:
>> I have a slightly reduced testcase, but it still requires about 50M of
>> objects so I'm working on reducing it even more.
>
> Any progress on t
Hi James,
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:21:44 + James Cowgill wrote:
> I have a slightly reduced testcase, but it still requires about 50M of
> objects so I'm working on reducing it even more.
Any progress on that? If you have sent this upstream already, can you share the
bug# ?
Thanks,
Emilio
On 02/02/18 10:35, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:21:44 + James Cowgill wrote:
>> On 27/01/18 19:13, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:12:14 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
>>> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:30:08 + James Cowgill
wrote:
>
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:21:44 + James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27/01/18 19:13, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:12:14 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:30:08 + James Cowgill
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 04/01/18 14:26, Gia
Hi,
On 27/01/18 19:13, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:12:14 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:30:08 + James Cowgill wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 04/01/18 14:26, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hello,
> Is there a way for me to run yo
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 16:12:14 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:30:08 + James Cowgill wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 04/01/18 14:26, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >> Is there a way for me to run your testcase without ghc-stage1 (which
> > >> would re
On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:30:08 + James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/01/18 14:26, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >> Is there a way for me to run your testcase without ghc-stage1 (which
> >> would require building ghc)?
> >
> > I don't know, however I attached ghc-stage1 binarie
On 03/01/18 09:35, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Source: binutils
> Version: 2.29.1-12
> Severity: important
> Control: affects -1 ghc
>
> Hi,
>
> gold segfaults when building ghc 8.2.2-1 on mips*:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ghc&ver=8.2.2-1
>
> Gianfranco tried with bin
Hi,
On 04/01/18 14:26, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Is there a way for me to run your testcase without ghc-stage1 (which
>> would require building ghc)?
>
> I don't know, however I attached ghc-stage1 binaries to the report
The "ghc-stage1" you attached is a shell script which exe
Hello,
>Is there a way for me to run your testcase without ghc-stage1 (which
>would require building ghc)?
I don't know, however I attached ghc-stage1 binaries to the report
G.
Hi,
On 04/01/18 09:11, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 10:35:18 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> Source: binutils
>> Version: 2.29.1-12
>> Severity: important
>> Control: affects -1 ghc
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> gold segfaults when building ghc 8.2.2-1 on mips*:
>>
>> https://bu
On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 10:35:18 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Source: binutils
> Version: 2.29.1-12
> Severity: important
> Control: affects -1 ghc
>
> Hi,
>
> gold segfaults when building ghc 8.2.2-1 on mips*:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ghc&ver=8.2.2-1
>
> Gianfra
Source: binutils
Version: 2.29.1-12
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 ghc
Hi,
gold segfaults when building ghc 8.2.2-1 on mips*:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ghc&ver=8.2.2-1
Gianfranco tried with binutils 2.29.51.20171218-1 as well and that failed too.
Unfortunately he cl
13 matches
Mail list logo