Bug#886849: suggestion rejected

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 13:24 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote: > I don't feel I can patch yarn myself to use execFile rather than > exec: this is a change that upstream should implement. I was asking if you could write a patch and send it to upstream for inclusion upstream, not keep it in Debian. --

Bug#886849: suggestion rejected

2018-04-07 Thread Paolo Greppi
Il 07/04/2018 11:23, Paul Wise ha scritto: > On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 11:08 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote: > >> The suggestion has been rejected > > Actually, they said they would be happy to merge a patch: > > https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/5208#issuecomment-364890352 > > I don't know

Bug#886849: suggestion rejected

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2018-04-07 at 11:08 +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote: > The suggestion has been rejected Actually, they said they would be happy to merge a patch: https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/5208#issuecomment-364890352 I don't know JavaScript well enough, could you write the patch? -- bye, pabs

Bug#886849: suggestion rejected

2018-04-07 Thread Paolo Greppi
The suggestion has been rejected by the nodejs module that is using puka that I'm trying to package (yarn). I'll now proceed with packaging puka. I'll add a note to README.Debian in yarnpkg on this. Paolo