clone 886968 -1
retitle -1 debhelper: Make -V the default for dh_makeshlibs
severity -1 wishlist
tags -1 patch
thanks
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> [...]
>
> It's not in policy (but I don't think it has to be), but following the
> conversation on #-ftp yesterday I opened:
>
> #895949 lintian: warn a
Hello,
Dimitri John Ledkov (2018-04-20):
> From my point of view, this is confusing... cause I regard myself as
> being part of the installer team myself.
>
> I guess you are advocating for general code review, more than two
> pairs of eyes on things?
There were no mails on debian-boot@, so tha
On 18 April 2018 at 08:18, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/04/18 01:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> That's another perfect example why udeb additions should get reviewed:
>> we would have noticed another buggy package, and its bugginess might not
>> have been copied over to another package.
>
On 18 April 2018 at 00:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dimitri John Ledkov (2018-04-17):
>> First, I apologize for not responding to this email earlier, as I have
>> missed it in my mailbox.
>
> It's a mail from hours ago, so there's no apology needed.
>
>> Secondly, my work has been blocked
On 18/04/18 01:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> That's another perfect example why udeb additions should get reviewed:
> we would have noticed another buggy package, and its bugginess might not
> have been copied over to another package.
I'm sure people don't request those reviews because they don't k
Hi,
Dimitri John Ledkov (2018-04-17):
> First, I apologize for not responding to this email earlier, as I have
> missed it in my mailbox.
It's a mail from hours ago, so there's no apology needed.
> Secondly, my work has been blocked by this NEW processing too for
> btrfs-progs. I'm not aware as
On 17 April 2018 at 19:01, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Dimitri John Ledkov (2018-01-15):
>> On 15 January 2018 at 00:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Cyril Brulebois (2018-01-12):
>> >> Your package is no longer installable (along with its rev-dep
>> >> partman-btrfs) because it now d
Dimitri John Ledkov (2018-01-15):
> On 15 January 2018 at 00:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Cyril Brulebois (2018-01-12):
> >> Your package is no longer installable (along with its rev-dep
> >> partman-btrfs) because it now depends on libzstd1, which isn't
> >> a udeb.
> >
> > It see
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 02:20:28PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 15 January 2018 at 00:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Cyril Brulebois (2018-01-12):
> >> Your package is no longer installable (along with its rev-dep
> >> partman-btrfs) because it now depends on libzstd1, which
On 15 January 2018 at 00:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois (2018-01-12):
>> Your package is no longer installable (along with its rev-dep
>> partman-btrfs) because it now depends on libzstd1, which isn't
>> a udeb.
>
> It seems zstd is only an option for btrfs-progs, and I've j
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2018-01-12):
> Your package is no longer installable (along with its rev-dep
> partman-btrfs) because it now depends on libzstd1, which isn't
> a udeb.
It seems zstd is only an option for btrfs-progs, and I've just confirmed
that setting --disable-zstd on the dh_auto_configu
Package: btrfs-progs-udeb
Version: 4.14.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[ Please keep debian-b...@lists.debian.org in copy. ]
Hi,
Your package is no longer installable (along with its rev-dep
partman-btrfs) because it now depends on libzstd1, which isn't
a udeb.
Che
12 matches
Mail list logo