Bug#887361: ccnet: Coordinated Packaging for ccnet and ccnet-server

2018-11-09 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > I've just uploaded working versions of the Seafile Client packages (that > are libsearpc, seafile and seafile-client) that don't require ccnet anymore. > > So if anyone wants to continue with packaging ccnet with the > ccnet-server sources, please feel free to do so. It's done : https://sml

Bug#887361: ccnet: Coordinated Packaging for ccnet and ccnet-server

2018-11-09 Thread Moritz Schlarb
Hello again, I've just uploaded working versions of the Seafile Client packages (that are libsearpc, seafile and seafile-client) that don't require ccnet anymore. So if anyone wants to continue with packaging ccnet with the ccnet-server sources, please feel free to do so. Best regards, Moritz O

Bug#887361: ccnet: Coordinated Packaging for ccnet and ccnet-server

2018-09-07 Thread Moritz Schlarb
Hi Nicholas, On 30.08.18 22:19, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > P.S. my apologies, I failed to notice that seafile-client was still at > 6.2.4 :-( ( https://github.com/haiwen/seafile ) > > I guess we still need to wait... The changes to really remove ccnet came shortly after they tagged 6.2.4 - I h

Bug#887361: ccnet: Coordinated Packaging for ccnet and ccnet-server

2018-08-30 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 04:16:14PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 06:13:03PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > (Sorry for missing References and In-Reply-To.) > > > > Hi all, > > > > First of all: Thanks a lot for your work on seafile -- highly > > appreciated! > > > >

Bug#887361: ccnet: Coordinated Packaging for ccnet and ccnet-server

2018-08-30 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hello! Licensing has been resolved: https://github.com/haiwen/ccnet/issues/7 https://github.com/haiwen/seafile/issues/631 https://github.com/haiwen/seafile/issues/666 On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 06:13:03PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > (Sorry for missing References and In-Reply-To.) > > Hi all, > >

Bug#887361: ccnet: Coordinated Packaging for ccnet and ccnet-server

2018-03-17 Thread Georg Faerber
(Sorry for missing References and In-Reply-To.) Hi all, First of all: Thanks a lot for your work on seafile -- highly appreciated! Upstream responded in the linked issue of Alexandre Rossi: "We're going to deprecate ccnet dependency in the upcoming 6.3 syncing client. Ccnet is currently only us

Bug#887361: ccnet: Coordinated Packaging for ccnet and ccnet-server

2018-01-15 Thread Moritz Schlarb
Package: ccnet Version: 6.1.4-1~bpo9+1 Severity: normal This bug is a split-off from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865830#25 regarding the duplication issues caused by also packaging ccnet-server. Effectively, both sources (e.g. repositories) contain pretty much the same code