On 02/10/2018 06:58 PM, Joerg Schiermeier, Bielefeld/Germany wrote:
> Jens Reyer wrote:
>> Still, I'd love to understand what this bug was about.
> Maybe I'm too "German":
Maybe, welcome in the club ;)
> in WinHQ.orgs website both version were set to 3.0 when wine v3.0 was
> published. "wine-dev
Jens Reyer wrote:
>> WineHQ | Debian Package
>>
>> stable version == wine
>> devel. version == wine-development
>>
>> Is this correct?
>
> Yes, that's correct.
Thanks for your clarification!
> Still, I'd love to understand what this bug was about.
Maybe I
[Adding the bugreport back in the address field]
On 02/06/2018 06:56 PM, Joerg Schiermeier, Bielefeld/Germany wrote:
> WineHQ | Debian Package
>
> stable version == wine
> devel. version == wine-development
>
> Is this correct?
Yes, that's correct. And
On 02/02/2018 08:10 PM, Joerg Schiermeier, Bielefeld/Germany wrote:
> the package version of 'wine-development' is lower than the version of
> 'normal' wine:
>
> wine-development: 3.0~rc6-1
> wine: 3.0-1
>
> Since January 18th, 2018 until today the WineHQ versions were set to v3.0.
> This was t
Package: wine-development
Version: 3.0~rc6-1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
the package version of 'wine-development' is lower than the version of 'normal'
wine:
wine-development: 3.0~rc6-1
wine: 3.0-1
Since January 18th, 2018 until today the WineHQ ve
5 matches
Mail list logo