Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-28 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Chris, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:47:19PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Nicholas, > > > It seems like ${python:Depends} is taking care of pulling in > > bin:python-lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 for > > bin:python-html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1, so there's no rush to upload > > an html5-parser_0.4.4-2, no? >

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-28 Thread Chris Lamb
Nicholas, > It seems like ${python:Depends} is taking care of pulling in > bin:python-lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 for > bin:python-html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1, so there's no rush to upload > an html5-parser_0.4.4-2, no? It FTBFS if you don't have 3.8.0 installed as the testsuite fails so won't it fail

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-28 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 06:18:35PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Nicholas, > > > > Okay, I've re-uploaded lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Did > > > html5-parser make it though yesterday? Let me know if not. > > > > If https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html is up-to-date, > > then no,

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-28 Thread Chris Lamb
Nicholas, > > Okay, I've re-uploaded lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Did > > html5-parser make it though yesterday? Let me know if not. > > If https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html is up-to-date, > then no, it didn't. Rebuilt and uploaded html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes.

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-28 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Chris, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 09:22:17AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Nicholas, > > Okay, I've re-uploaded lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Did > html5-parser make it though yesterday? Let me know if not. If https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html is up-to-date, then no, it didn't.

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-28 Thread Chris Lamb
Nicholas, Okay, I've re-uploaded lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Did html5-parser make it though yesterday? Let me know if not. > > The following packages will be REMOVED: > > calibre-build-deps […] > This issue sounds like "Using backported debhelper considered tricky" > (

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-27 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Chris, On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:31:43AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 889854 + pending > thanks > > Hi Nicholas, > > (Shame to spend effort where upstream is so toxic, alas...). Mm, I've read a bit about it... I wonder if he'll really maintain Python 2? > Anyway, > I've uploaded: > >

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-27 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 889854 + pending thanks Hi Nicholas, (Shame to spend effort where upstream is so toxic, alas...). Anyway, I've uploaded: lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes .. to -backports. Calibre does not install its build-dependencies, even after

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-06-26 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Chris, On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 04:16:19PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Dear Backports Team and Mentors, > > I am still pursuing sponsorship of a stretch-backport of calibre and > its dependencies. > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:15:26PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Package:

Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]

2018-04-24 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Dear Backports Team and Mentors, I am still pursuing sponsorship of a stretch-backport of calibre and its dependencies. On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:15:26PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my