On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 06:58:50PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> > > I think the distinction is that the other packages that tweak sysctl
> > > values don't claim to be doing so on behalf of the kernel team. If
> > > the
> > > kernel team is responsible for the values being set, then the
> > >
Hi,
Le 2021-01-21 00:43, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 14:46 -0800, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:39:16PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> > > > We could do that. However, in the past (earlier in this bug,
> > > > even) it's
> > > > been pointed out that
On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 14:46 -0800, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:39:16PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> > > We could do that. However, in the past (earlier in this bug,
> > > even) it's
> > > been pointed out that other packages should not be responsible
> > > for
> > > setting
Le 2021-01-20 14:46, Noah Meyerhans a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:39:16PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> > > We could do that. However, in the past (earlier in this bug, even) it's
> > > been pointed out that other packages should not be responsible for
> > > setting kernel policies, so
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:39:16PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> > We could do that. However, in the past (earlier in this bug, even) it's
> > been pointed out that other packages should not be responsible for
> > setting kernel policies, so changes like this should be the
> > responsibility of
Le 2021-01-20 13:58, Noah Meyerhans a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:22:16PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> > My proposal would differ from yours though in that it would not touch the
> > kernel
> > configuration but would instead consist in patching procps to provide a
> > configuration file
Control: tags -1 + patch
A proposed patch is at
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/309
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:22:16PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> My proposal would differ from yours though in that it would not touch the
> kernel
> configuration but would instead consist in patching procps to provide a
> configuration file (let's say default_qdisc.conf) to set the value of the
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 10:29:44PM -0300, Ivan Baldo wrote:
> I think we want the mq qdisc to distribute the load between cores, to
> support very high speed network cards or too slow CPUs.
Yep, you're right. Though it's not about CPU cores, but about tx queues
on the NIC hardware.
>
Hi Noah,
Le 2021-01-07 16:12, Noah Meyerhans a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:34:06PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > #890343 was originally opened against systemd asking to install the upstream
> > systemd sysctl.d/50-default.conf file that sets:
> >
> > net.core.default_qdisc = fq_codel
>
Hello.
Not an expert nor kernel developer, etc., just simple sysadmin
here, but will answer anyway since nobody did yet.
I think we want the mq qdisc to distribute the load between cores,
to support very high speed network cards or too slow CPUs.
Also, if
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:34:06PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> #890343 was originally opened against systemd asking to install the upstream
> systemd sysctl.d/50-default.conf file that sets:
>
> net.core.default_qdisc = fq_codel
>
> As explained in #950701 (and the systemd debian changelog) the
On 4/23/20 4:24 PM, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:34:06PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
fq_codel is better in every way than pfifo_fast and I am unaware of any
reason why it would not be a better default. (but don't trust me, ask the
kernel networking experts)
Isn't CAKE
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:34:06PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> fq_codel is better in every way than pfifo_fast and I am unaware of any
> reason why it would not be a better default. (but don't trust me, ask the
> kernel networking experts)
Isn't CAKE supposed to be even better than fq_codel,
#890343 was originally opened against systemd asking to install the
upstream systemd sysctl.d/50-default.conf file that sets:
net.core.default_qdisc = fq_codel
As explained in #950701 (and the systemd debian changelog) the debian
systemd maintainers felt that systemd in debian should not be
15 matches
Mail list logo
