Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology

tags 890959 + pending thanks Dear Ben, Thanks so much for this. Applied in Git, pending upload: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=4960b883510805450914344df900091874c13528 Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org

Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology

On 21-Feb-2018, Niels Thykier wrote: > I have just a quick scroll through the changes. Thank you! > I notice that we will be renaming the tags, but I do not see any > changes to: > data/override/renamed-tags Right, I wasn't aware of that file at all. I have now edited the commit history and

Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology

Ben Finney: > Control: tags -1 + patch > > I have made a series of commits in my fork repository, in the branch > ‘wip/issue/one-header-multiple-fields’, to address this bug > . > > [...] > Hi Ben, I

Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology

Control: tags -1 + patch I have made a series of commits in my fork repository, in the branch ‘wip/issue/one-header-multiple-fields’, to address this bug . The ‘git request-pull’ output is: The following

Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.75 Severity: minor The term “header” is used to refer to many concepts in Lintian source code, data, and user-facing text. Some of these uses are correct, others are not. This leads to confusion when trying to interpret Lintian texts versus standards and