Bug#892842: OpenJDK 8 archive re-entry

2021-05-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >I assume the normal > process of looking at it and eventually getting back to us will run > now. So far, nothing happened, and repeated inquiries got no response at all. Just keeping the list informed. bye, //mirabilos -- Infrastrukturexperte •

Bug#892842: OpenJDK 8 archive re-entry

2021-04-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi again, > > Emmanuel, will you or should I? > > Please do. sorry for taking a bit, but I did today. I talked a bit with elbrus, explaining the reasoning, and that, of course, this won’t end up in bookworm or have any sort of official support — I assume the normal process of looking at it and

Bug#892842: OpenJDK 8 archive re-entry

2021-04-22 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 22/04/2021 à 02:51, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > unfortunately not yet. They’re probably depriorising sid in times of > freeze, but the grace period for not bothering them is probably over > by now so if ebourg doesn’t want to prod them now, I can do this but > nobody else should so they don’t

Bug#892842: OpenJDK 8 archive re-entry

2021-04-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Phil, > I'm sure it's just a matter of time, but have you had any feedback from > ftp-masters about openjdk-8? unfortunately not yet. They’re probably depriorising sid in times of freeze, but the grace period for not bothering them is probably over by now so if ebourg doesn’t want to prod

Bug#892842: OpenJDK 8 archive re-entry

2021-04-21 Thread Phil Morrell
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:03:44PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 24/03/2021 à 22:13, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > > > I can certainly bring it back to unstable, built with > > > gcc 10, if there are no major issues involved in making > > > it