Bug#893302: lwjgl FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-07-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Control: reopen -1 Control: severity -1 important I'm reopening the bug because ultimately this issue will have to be fixed, but I'm lowering the severity to prevent the autoremoval.

Bug#893302: lwjgl FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-04-25 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 25.04.2018 um 03:09 schrieb Michael Gilbert: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: >> lwjgl 2.9.3 is a legacy release from 2015. It is the last version of the >> 2.x series and no longer supported. Upstream moved to lwjgl 3. If nobody >> can fix this we should consider to re

Bug#893302: lwjgl FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-04-24 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > lwjgl 2.9.3 is a legacy release from 2015. It is the last version of the > 2.x series and no longer supported. Upstream moved to lwjgl 3. If nobody > can fix this we should consider to remove lwjgl because the new version > 3 would require n

Bug#893302: lwjgl FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-04-23 Thread Markus Koschany
I had a go at this today. This package has multiple issues. I tried to work around the RuntimeExceptions by returning true instead of throwing an exception. Very bad I know. It turned out that not only one but four classes are not properly generated at build time. Those will cause missing symbol e

Bug#893302: lwjgl FTBFS with openjdk-9

2018-03-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: lwjgl Version: 2.9.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/lwjgl.html ... generate-openal: [processor] Compiling 3 source files to /build/1st/lwjgl-2.9.3+dfsg/bin [processor] warning: [options] bootstrap class path not