[Filip Hanes]
> Hi,
> I'm new maintainer of casparcg-server after pere.
And I am very happy to have a replacement who actually use the
package. :) The package is also moved under the Debian Multimedia
umbrella, allowing more people to particiate. :)
>> 1) Chromium adds a chromium-source binary
Hi,
I'm new maintainer of casparcg-server after pere.
> 1) Chromium adds a chromium-source binary package, with the understanding
> that whoever packages CEF will keep it out of stable
Could we try this option 1) to make some progress at least in unstable and
testing
and later with more
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:00:23 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Ultimately this is up for Michael to decide, as he's dealing with
For the record, I registered WNPP https://bugs.debian.org/915400 >
asking for CEF before I was made aware of this discussion.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Ultimately this is up for Michael to decide, as he's dealing with Chromium
> > updates single-handedly.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Personally I have no
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Ultimately this is up for Michael to decide, as he's dealing with Chromium
> updates single-handedly.
Agreed.
> Personally I have no reservations against this entering unstable, but this
> doesn't sound
> like something that
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:00:24AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
> > being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break
> >
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
> being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break
> anything else. Adding CEF as a reverse dependency would change that.
^^
> On
On 15/10/2018 19:19, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:29:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:17:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
being a leaf package,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:29:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:17:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>>> Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
>>> being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break
>>> anything
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:17:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
>> being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break
>> anything else. Adding CEF as a reverse dependency would change that.
>>
>> This is
On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 06:08:53PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I am more concerned about major version updates. I anticipate nearly
> each one will cause CEF to fail to build from source, causing new RC
> bugs often in the stable release.
Yes, CEF will definitely need upgrading on major
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 3:36 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:28:29PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Are you intending CEF to make it into a stable release?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Since chromium's source is updated every few weeks for security updates,
>> won't CEF need to be
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> As mentioned on pkg-chromium-browser@, it would be useful if chromium-browser
>> shipped a chromium-browser source package; it would allow packaging and
>> building
>> CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework) against Debian's
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:28:29PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Are you intending CEF to make it into a stable release?
Yes.
> Since chromium's source is updated every few weeks for security updates,
> won't CEF need to be updated just as often?
Yes. CEF generally follows Chromium fairly
control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:39:22PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> As mentioned on pkg-chromium-browser@, it would be useful if chromium-browser
> shipped a chromium-browser source package; it would allow packaging and
> building
> CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework)
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:39:22PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> As mentioned on pkg-chromium-browser@, it would be useful if chromium-browser
> shipped a chromium-browser source package; it would allow packaging and
> building
> CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework) against Debian's (patched)
Source: chromium-browser
Version: 65.0.3325.146-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
As mentioned on pkg-chromium-browser@, it would be useful if chromium-browser
shipped a chromium-browser source package; it would allow packaging and building
CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework) against Debian's
18 matches
Mail list logo
