Le 15/04/2018 à 11:42, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> So there's no way to create a modified version of libtablelayout-java
> that can be used as a drop-in replacement for the original upstream
> TableLayout.
Fundamentally the libtablelayout-java package in Debian is a fork of the
project named
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 11:42:20AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:09:47 +0200 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> > Le 28/03/2018 à 23:34, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> >
> > > In other words, can someone develop a fork of libtablelayout-java (with
> > > the namespace changed to a
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:38:42 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 28.03.2018 um 23:34 schrieb Francesco Poli:
> > On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:22:12 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
> > debian-legal is more like a sort of advisory board, where licensing
> > issues are discussed and analyzed. The FTP
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:09:47 +0200 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/03/2018 à 23:34, Francesco Poli a écrit :
>
> > In other words, can someone develop a fork of libtablelayout-java (with
> > the namespace changed to a different one) which works as a drop-in
> > replacement for the original
Am 28.03.2018 um 23:34 schrieb Francesco Poli:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:22:12 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> Am 24.03.2018 um 00:17 schrieb Francesco Poli:
> [...]
>>> Was the debian-legal discussion pointed out to the FTP Masters?
>>> Did they explain the rationale behind their decision?
>>
Le 28/03/2018 à 23:34, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> In other words, can someone develop a fork of libtablelayout-java (with
> the namespace changed to a different one) which works as a drop-in
> replacement for the original libtablelayout-java?
If you change the namespace it can't be used as a
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 15:22:12 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 24.03.2018 um 00:17 schrieb Francesco Poli:
[...]
> > Was the debian-legal discussion pointed out to the FTP Masters?
> > Did they explain the rationale behind their decision?
>
> FYI, debian-legal is a mailing list and not a Debian
Am 24.03.2018 um 00:17 schrieb Francesco Poli:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:30:53 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> Am 19.03.2018 um 22:28 schrieb Francesco Poli (wintermute):
> [...]
>>> I noticed that the license was
>>> [discussed](https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/06/msg00050.html)
>>>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:30:53 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 19.03.2018 um 22:28 schrieb Francesco Poli (wintermute):
[...]
> > I noticed that the license was
> > [discussed](https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/06/msg00050.html)
> > on debian-legal a long time ago.
> > My
> >
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:41:04 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]
> In https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00142.html you
> agreed entirely that it is OK when software is made DFSG-free through
> renaming to avoid trademark violations.
>
> What difference would it make whether our users
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:28:13PM +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
>...
> The debian/copyright file states, in part:
>
> | The source code has been modified to make the package suitable for main (see
> | license III. 4.). The package namespace has been changed from
> |
Package: libtablelayout-java
Version: 20090826-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hello!
Thanks for maintaining this package in Debian.
I noticed that the license was
[discussed](https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/06/msg00050.html)
on debian-legal a long time ago.
My
12 matches
Mail list logo
