Bug#894262: closed by Adrian Bunk (gconf has been adopted)

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:33:51AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >... > Anyway, there are > https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gconf > https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gconf-editor > > Let me know where you want those repos to be moved to. > > Because of issues with the svn-to-gconf conversion,

Bug#894262: closed by Adrian Bunk (gconf has been adopted)

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:21 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > We have (sometimes quite popular) packages that are unmaintained > upstream for over 20 years - this is not a problem, actually far > less of a problem than active upstreams breaking various stuff. > > And the package is not unmaintained in

Bug#894262: closed by Adrian Bunk (gconf has been adopted)

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 07:32:58AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > From: Adrian Bunk > > To: 894262-d...@bugs.debian.org > > Cc: > > Bcc: > > Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:01:58 +0300 > > Subject: gconf has been adopted > > gconf has been adopted, making it a non-issue when a reverse dependency > >

Bug#894262: closed by Adrian Bunk (gconf has been adopted)

> From: Adrian Bunk > To: 894262-d...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:01:58 +0300 > Subject: gconf has been adopted > gconf has been adopted, making it a non-issue when a reverse dependency > depends on it. That only fixes one of the issues I have with the package. It is