Bug#896186: Info received (Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP])

control: noowner -1 I quit reviewing this RFS, because frequent and incooperative force-{push,squash}'es drive me crazy, which makes it hard to track the changes. Any mentors interested in this package can take it over. I guess the package was nearly in shape, and the remaining reviewing work

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

Hi Yangfl, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:43:07PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > 2018-05-20 19:50 GMT+08:00 Lumin : > > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:37:27AM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > >> control: tag -1 - moreinfo > >> > >> Reuploaded. > > > > Please fix your

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

2018-05-20 19:50 GMT+08:00 Lumin : > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:37:27AM +0800, Yangfl wrote: >> control: tag -1 - moreinfo >> >> Reuploaded. > > Please fix your packaging repo first: > >

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:37:27AM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > control: tag -1 - moreinfo > > Reuploaded. Please fix your packaging repo first: https://salsa.debian.org/chinese-team/netctl/network/master The stuff in the master branch is identical to the upstream

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 - moreinfo Reuploaded.

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

Hi Yangfl, Some feedbacks after checking you package: 1. Vcs-* fields are missing, which makes it hard to track the changes. I'd recommend you to put the packaging work on salsa or somewhere alike. 2. lintian overrides: why do you override them? Please add the explanation as comments

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "netctl" * Package name: netctl Version : 1.16-1 Upstream Author : Jouke Witteveen * URL : https://git.archlinux.org/netctl.git * License : GPL3