Bug#897188: stretch-pu: package ghostscript/9.20~dfsg-3.2+deb9u2

2018-05-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2018-05-26 at 11:09 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:39:12AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2018-04-29 at 20:43 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > I would like to

Bug#897188: stretch-pu: package ghostscript/9.20~dfsg-3.2+deb9u2

2018-05-26 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:39:12AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sun, 2018-04-29 at 20:43 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I would like to propose the following ghostscript update via a > > stretch > > point release. It adresses two CVEs which do

Bug#897188: stretch-pu: package ghostscript/9.20~dfsg-3.2+deb9u2

2018-05-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2018-04-29 at 20:43 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I would like to propose the following ghostscript update via a > stretch > point release. It adresses two CVEs which do not warrant a DSA on > it's > own but would still be good to be adressed in stable.

Bug#897188: stretch-pu: package ghostscript/9.20~dfsg-3.2+deb9u2

2018-04-29 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi I would like to propose the following ghostscript update via a stretch point release. It adresses two CVEs which do not warrant a DSA on it's own but would still be good to be