Hi Chris,
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 06:51:17PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Nicholas,
>
> > Continuing from #883218. Strictly speaking I think this might be a
> > §4.9 "clean (required)" Policy violation and should be priority
> > "serious", but I'd like to keep it as "important" until
>
> I fear
Nicholas,
> Continuing from #883218. Strictly speaking I think this might be a
> §4.9 "clean (required)" Policy violation and should be priority
> "serious", but I'd like to keep it as "important" until
I fear looking up the exact Policy reference, writing this mail and
additionally providing a
Package: elpy
Version: 1.20.0-1
Severity: important
Continuing from #883218. Strictly speaking I think this might be a
§4.9 "clean (required)" Policy violation and should be priority
"serious", but I'd like to keep it as "important" until June because
it does not affect the usability of
3 matches
Mail list logo
