On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Yangfl wrote:
> I don't see there's a need to edit or regenerate PDF doc; it just
> provides some simple API documents. Anyway I remove it since I just
> want to provide a shared library (for utox).
When the API changes, the documentation will need to change
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> I also don't see any source for the PDF documentation.
According to the PDF metadata, the source is minini.dvi and the PDF
was built using a very old version of dvips (from texlive-binaries),
please ask upstream if they still have a copy of
Adam Borowski 于2018年9月17日周一 下午6:00写道：
>
> I see that "NOTICE" includes Steven Van Ingelgem and Luca Bassanello as
> contributors, and at least the former is above the threshold of
> copyrightability (a rule of thumb says ~10 lines are a reasonable boundary
> between a trivial vs non-trivial
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:01:56PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> Hmm seems like a new symbol in gcc8... anyway fixed and reuploaded.
> Lintian clean and sbuild amd54/i386 passed.
Thanks, the packaging seems to work well now.
Alas, this can't be said about copyright stuff.
I see that "NOTICE" includes
Adam Borowski 于2018年9月16日周日 上午4:36写道：
>
> symbols file produces:
>
>
> _ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE12_M_constructIPKcEEvT_S8_St20forward_iterator_tag@Ba
> se 1.2.a-1
Hmm seems like a new symbol in gcc8... anyway fixed and reuploaded.
Lintian clean and sbuild amd54/i386
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:24:39PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> * Package name: libminini
>Version : 1.2.a-1
>Upstream Author : Thiadmer Riemersma
> * URL : https://www.compuphase.com/minini.htm
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> libminini-dev - minimal INI
Reuploaded with only d/copyright changed. Thanks.
2018-06-17 17:36 GMT+08:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> The project license has an exception, which you have put into the Comment:
> field in d/copyright, putting just "Apache-2" into the License field. This
> is incorrect, as the project license is not
The project license has an exception, which you have put into the Comment:
field in d/copyright, putting just "Apache-2" into the License field. This
is incorrect, as the project license is not "Apache-2". The Comment: is
not meant to contains parts of the license. You should also look at the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libminini"
* Package name: libminini
Version : 1.2.a-1
Upstream Author : Thiadmer Riemersma
* URL : https://www.compuphase.com/minini.htm
* License
9 matches
Mail list logo
