Bug#900912: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912)

2019-04-11 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11.04.19 20:24, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi doko, > > On 07-04-2019 12:08, Samuel Thibault wrote: >>> I disagree. I'll do the next upload with Samuel's proposed patches, not >>> enabling that by default, together with the planned security update. Then >>> people can start testing if the wrapper

Bug#900912: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912)

2019-04-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi doko, On 07-04-2019 12:08, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> I disagree. I'll do the next upload with Samuel's proposed patches, not >> enabling that by default, together with the planned security update. Then >> people can start testing if the wrapper works. > > Well, I'm afraid that what will

Bug#900912: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912)

2019-04-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Vincent Privat, le dim. 07 avril 2019 21:55:33 +0200, a ecrit: > Disabling it only through accessibility.properties means we have no control > over it from JOSM. So when the next bug appears, we'll have to tell all of our > impacted Ubuntu users to modify the file. We are here only talking about

Bug#900912: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912)

2019-04-07 Thread Vincent Privat
If enabled by default, please offer a reliable way for applications to disable it. We don't need it for JOSM, and we have been so impacted with jaw's problems in the past years that we will never want it enabled by default for us. Le dim. 7 avr. 2019 à 12:08, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Hello,

Bug#900912: Enabling jaw (Java-atk-wrapper) by default ? (Bug#900912)

2019-04-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Matthias Klose, le sam. 06 avril 2019 15:46:21 +0200, a ecrit: > On 06.04.19 15:13, Paul Gevers wrote: > > We're late already, I would want this rather sooner than latter > > in buster, such that there is some real live testing before we release. > > Sure, there are chances for bugs, but