The ATK was updated to use the new interface last year by Fridrich
Strba [1,2], but it seems that upstream never updated it to include
those patches - the bugs he reported and attached patches remain open.
Might be worth to check if we can apply these to our packages.
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.jav
On 13.07.2018 12:39, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Matthias Klose, le ven. 13 juil. 2018 12:04:42 +0200, a ecrit:
this issue now has two patches, one to install the properties file, and the
other to extend the class path. Are both needed?
Yes.
Can you see any compatibility issues when the
Hello,
Matthias Klose, le ven. 13 juil. 2018 12:04:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> this issue now has two patches, one to install the properties file, and the
> other to extend the class path. Are both needed?
Yes.
> Can you see any compatibility issues when the accessibility stuff
> isn't used?
I didn't
Samuel,
this issue now has two patches, one to install the properties file, and the
other to extend the class path. Are both needed? Can you see any compatibility
issues when the accessibility stuff isn't used?
Control: tags -1 + patch
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 11 juin 2018 15:17:05 +0200, a ecrit:
> be it a hardcoded classpath to java-atk-wrapper.jar.
For instance the attached patch works fine (and doesn't disturb the
headless case).
Samuel
Index: openjdk-10-10.0.1+10/src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.cpp
Control: severity -1 serious
Ah, openjdk-10 is actually the default java implementation nowadays,
so this actually completely breaks the usefulness of java-atk-wrapper
to make java applications accessible, we really need to work out a
solution, be it a hardcoded classpath to java-atk-wrapper.jar.
Hello,
FTR, I have submitted the issue on java.com with review ID 9055601, but
since the java atk wrapper is an external thing, they might just not
want to spend time on it...
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 11 juin 2018 10:51:51 +0200, a ecrit:
> ifeq (0,1)
> # FIXME: ext not longer supported
More background is available on
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/261#Class-loaders
So the idea would be that the java atk wrapper should be put into the
pl
Hello,
Samuel Thibault, le mer. 06 juin 2018 16:00:37 +0300, a ecrit:
> Like with openjdk-9, accessibility does not work in the openjdk-10
> packages, the libatk-wrapper and java-atk-wrapper do not get loaded.
As mentioned on
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2018-June/msg00112.html the
a
Source: openjdk-10
Version: 10.0.1+10-4
Severity: important
Tags: a11y
Hello,
Like with openjdk-9, accessibility does not work in the openjdk-10
packages, the libatk-wrapper and java-atk-wrapper do not get loaded.
See Bug#822642 for my researches at the time, I gues things haven't
improved since
10 matches
Mail list logo
