On 2018-10-04 19:33, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
> On 03.10.2018 11:17 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
>> Rather pdftk-java should take over the pdftk binary package, s.t. there
>> is an upgrade path. (A Provides: pdftk does not create an upgrade path).
>> That should make the old pdftk source package go
On 03.10.2018 11:17 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Rather pdftk-java should take over the pdftk binary package, s.t. there
> is an upgrade path. (A Provides: pdftk does not create an upgrade path).
> That should make the old pdftk source package go away ...
My plan for the upgrade path was to release
Control: tag -1 sid
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:09:50 -0300 Felipe Sateler
wrote:
> > Thanks for your report. The pdftk package in Debian Sid is currently not
> > installable and will be removed, as the required GCJ packages were
> > removed from Debian.
>
> Then this report is release-critical.
Control: severity -1 serious
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:08:42 +0200 Johann Felix Soden
wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On 18.06.2018 08:21, Oliver Kopp wrote:
> > Package: pdftk
> > Version: 2.02-4+b2
> >
> > [...]
> > Does the build of pdftk be modified or should the team behind libgcj17
> > be contacted?
Hi Oliver,
On 18.06.2018 08:21, Oliver Kopp wrote:
> Package: pdftk
> Version: 2.02-4+b2
>
> [...]
> Does the build of pdftk be modified or should the team behind libgcj17
> be contacted?
>
Thanks for your report. The pdftk package in Debian Sid is currently not
installable and will be removed,
Package: pdftk
Version: 2.02-4+b2
I am using the Docker image debian:sid and I am executing "apt-get
install pdftk". The output is
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
pdftk : Depends: libgcj17 (>= 5) but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken
6 matches
Mail list logo
