Le 20/06/2018 à 00:21, Guilhem Moulin a écrit :
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 at 23:52:45 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> Sorry, I meant between your backup initrd.img (presumably also compiled
>> with MODULES=dep) and the new, broken one.
> Alternatively, if you don't have this initrd around anymore, are
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 at 23:52:45 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Sorry, I meant between your backup initrd.img (presumably also compiled
> with MODULES=dep) and the new, broken one.
Alternatively, if you don't have this initrd around anymore, are you able
to boot if you add the ‘xts’ module to the
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 at 23:00:29 +0200, Adrien CLERC wrote:
> Le 19/06/2018 à 22:40, Guilhem Moulin a écrit :
>> Could you run the following on both the broken and backup initrd and
>> send the diff?
>>
>> lsinitramfs /path/to/initrd.img | grep ^lib/modules/ | sort
>
> See
Le 19/06/2018 à 23:06, Guilhem Moulin a écrit :
> Just noticed what looks like a regression, I wonder if that's the same
> problem. Does your system have AES-NI or similar, or are you using the
> generic modules? What's the output of
>
> grep -A2 '^name *: *xts(aes)' /proc/crypto
>
# grep
Le 19/06/2018 à 22:40, Guilhem Moulin a écrit :
> Could you run the following on both the broken and backup initrd and
> send the diff?
>
> lsinitramfs /path/to/initrd.img | grep ^lib/modules/ | sort
See initramfs_dep_vs_most.diff.gz. The dep output is not working, and
the most output is
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 at 22:40:23 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> FWIW 2.0.3-2 was tested with MODULES=dep, too. I wonder how your system
> differs from our test environments.
Just noticed what looks like a regression, I wonder if that's the same
problem. Does your system have AES-NI or similar,
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 at 21:39:06 +0200, Adrien CLERC wrote:
> Fortunately, the previous one has still a valid initramfs, so I can boot
> my system (many thanks for that backup system).
> […]
> Check that kernel supports aes-xts-plain64 cipher (check syslog for
> more info).
Could you run the
Package: cryptsetup-initramfs
Version: 2:2.0.3-2
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
I have a full disk-encryption set up with LUKS.
After upgrading from 2.0.3-1 to 2.0.3-2 my last (and current) kernel is
unbootable.
Fortunately, the previous one has still a
8 matches
Mail list logo
