On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 07:34:19AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I've not added any specific driver allowance, and if this is for the
> proprietary
> nvidia driver I am not going to do so.
>
> If so, that basically leaves /etc/java-?-openjdk/security/java.security r,
> - which again proves that
severity 903900 wishlist
tag 903900 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:42:30PM +0100, Nuno Oliveira wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-common
> Version: 1:6.0.6~rc1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> The following seem to be required, to avoid AppArmor from complaining from
> file
> acess:
>
>
retitle 903900 libreoffice-common: apparmor denies java.security access
severity 903900 - moreinfo
tag 903900 normal
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:21:42AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > /etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security r,
> ^
> (Almost) valid. Though I wonder why
severity 903900 minor
tag 903900 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:42:30PM +0100, Nuno Oliveira wrote:
> ### Extra:
> /dev/nvidia0 rw,
> /dev/nvidiactl rw,
> /dev/nvidia-modeset rw,
Nvidia. And looks like the proprietary driver.
(I don't use nvidia cards myself, a IRC query makes
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:6.0.6~rc1-1
Severity: normal
The following seem to be required, to avoid AppArmor from complaining from file
acess:
### Extra:
/dev/nvidia0 rw,
/dev/nvidiactl rw,
/dev/nvidia-modeset rw,
/etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security r,
owner /tmp/.gl* rwm,
5 matches
Mail list logo
