Bug#904862: dgit: should pass --no-source-only-changes to pbuilder

2018-11-11 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sun 11 Nov 2018 at 01:54PM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote: > I guess there is no way to tell at runtime whether pbuilder supports > this option. As it is these changes need a Breaks. Breaks seems far too strong when `dgit pbuilder` is not core dgit functionality. > How about: provide

Bug#904862: dgit: should pass --no-source-only-changes to pbuilder

2018-11-11 Thread Ian Jackson
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#904862: dgit: should pass --no-source-only-changes to pbuilder"): > Applying these patches does mean that `dgit pbuilder` will probably > error out with older pbuilder installed, such as the version in stretch. > But it looks like the pbuilder mainta

Bug#904862: dgit: should pass --no-source-only-changes to pbuilder

2018-11-10 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +patch Hello, On Sun 29 Jul 2018 at 09:50AM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: > I think this is likely to be implemented in pbuilder so here is a bug so > we remember to patch dgit to use the new option. > > We'd also want to remove the warning about SOURCE_ONLY_CHANGES=yes from >

Bug#904862: dgit: should pass --no-source-only-changes to pbuilder

2018-07-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Rationale: if we don't pass this, pbuilder might overwrite the _source.changes produced by dgit. The new _source.changes will probably work for an upload, but won't respect the -v option passed to dgit or calculated by dgit. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#904862: dgit: should pass --no-source-only-changes to pbuilder

2018-07-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: dgit Version: 6.1 Control: block -1 by 904716 Hello, I think this is likely to be implemented in pbuilder so here is a bug so we remember to patch dgit to use the new option. We'd also want to remove the warning about SOURCE_ONLY_CHANGES=yes from dgit(1). -- Sean Whitton