On 2018-08-15 05:45, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno:
> [...]
> >> then removing clsync from testing is also an option
> >> AFAICT.
> >>
> >> I am considering since clsync has had its FTBFS bug against sid for
> >> almost 2 years now with no reaction from its maintainers.
> >
> > That soluti
Aurelien Jarno:
> [...]
>>
>> Hi Aurelien,
>>
>> If the goal is to make testing free of packages (Pre-)Depending on
>> multiarch-support
>
> Yes, that's exactly the goal, that way we can just stop building the
> package in the next upload. There are still a few depending packages
> in sid/experime
Hi Niels,
On 2018-08-14 17:53, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Aurelien Jarno:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: binnmu
> >
> > Hi release team,
> >
> > One of the goal of the glibc team for b
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Aurelien Jarno:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi release team,
>
> One of the goal of the glibc team for buster is to get rid of the
> multiarch-support package, given that multiarc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi release team,
One of the goal of the glibc team for buster is to get rid of the
multiarch-support package, given that multiarch support in the dynamic
loader is fully supported in debian
5 matches
Mail list logo
