Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
Paul, thank you for all the effort you have put into this. I understand and appreciate the effort. I am basically not objecting to whatever solution there will be, it is ultimately that package maintainer’s decision, and I am sorry I can’t be more helpful, but my free time is limited and all

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 09-11-18 20:09, Ondřej Surý wrote: > But somehow for this simple package I would just prefer to just bite > the bullet once in a while, do binNMU and then suffer it through… My > experience tells me that “the simpler the better” even if it’s not > perfect. Perfect but complex tend to break

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
Well, it’s either making the package binNMUable (using generic php-fpm test dependency) or recording the exact dependencies (using php7.3-fpm) or dynamically generating debian/tests/control like I do for php-defaults (which requires much more complex system). But somehow for this simple

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ondřej, On 09-11-18 18:39, Ondřej Surý wrote: > The versioned depends is needed only for autopkgtests and not for the package > itself. So, I think the dependency is useless there. I misunderstood you then. Still, if a test case of a package requires a different specific (minimum) version

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
The versioned depends is needed only for autopkgtests and not for the package itself. So, I think the dependency is useless there. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý > On 9 Nov 2018, at 10:37, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Hi, > > Hmm, I should read my backlog before replying. > >> On 08-11-18 22:53, Ondřej

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, Hmm, I should read my backlog before replying. On 08-11-18 22:53, Ondřej Surý wrote: > But php-defaults and rss-bridge needs to go together. That is ok, but where is this coded in the dependencies? > I thought that runtime detection of default PHP version in autopkgtest would > be

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ondřej, On 08-11-18 22:47, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> On 9 Nov 2018, at 03:35, Paul Gevers wrote: >> >> You also uploaded (NMU) two revisions of rss-bridge. The last one is >> stuck in unstable because you broke the autopkgtest. > > Umm, no? > >

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-08 Thread Ondřej Surý
But php-defaults and rss-bridge needs to go together. I thought that runtime detection of default PHP version in autopkgtest would be overkill, so the socket path is hardcoded at the build-time. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org > On 9 Nov 2018, at 04:47, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > Hi

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-08 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Paul, > On 9 Nov 2018, at 03:35, Paul Gevers wrote: > > You also uploaded (NMU) two revisions of rss-bridge. The last one is > stuck in unstable because you broke the autopkgtest. Umm, no? https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/r/rss-bridge/1281281/log.gz

Bug#906643: Bug#911832: Bug#906643: transition: php7.3

2018-11-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ondřej, On 07-11-18 20:48, Ondřej Surý wrote: > I solved the doctrine bug, but php-symfony-polyfill 1.10.0 turned out to be > harder nut to crack: > > For reference: > > 1. I removed references for Normalizer::NONE as they were testing if the code > would "assert" (whatever that means in