Hello Andreas Tille,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on virtuoso-opensource package and I realised that lintian
> is issuing an error even if the reason is deactivated by a comment like
> here:
>
>
Hi Andreas,
> > We are trying to warn about instances such as:
>
> You are actually not warning but throwing an error about this
I meant "warn" interchangeably with "emit" — I tend to use "warn" in
quite a general way. Apologies for any confusion.
(Indeed, I pay *far* less attention to the
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> >
> > I admit I did not checked the lintian code but why do you expect so
> > many true-positives when ignoring those cases where some
> >
> >"# *"
>
> We are trying to warn about instances such as:
You are actually
Hi Andreas,
> > > Please check whether there is a comment sign before RUN (and others)
> > > before issuing the error.
> >
> > I understand the issue here but I fear this will result in many true-
> > positives not being detected.
>
> I admit I did not checked the lintian code but why do you
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:10:45PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > Please check whether there is a comment sign before RUN (and others)
> > before issuing the error.
>
> I understand the issue here but I fear this will result in many true-
> positives not being detected.
I admit I did
tags 907019 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Andreas,
> Please check whether there is a comment sign before RUN (and others)
> before issuing the error.
I understand the issue here but I fear this will result in many true-
positives not being detected.
A proceeding comment does not universally signify
Package: lintian
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm working on virtuoso-opensource package and I realised that lintian
is issuing an error even if the reason is deactivated by a comment like
here:
7 matches
Mail list logo
