tags 908540 + pending
thanks
Dear Santiago,
> I've just noticed that the package FTBFS in experimental in
> reproducible builds
[..]
> Would that be enough to consider that the problem is most probably not
> fixed in experimental?
Indeed. I'm really tired of playing whack-a-mole with the
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:54:49AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I would be curious to know whether you can reproduce there as
> I am likely to merge that into unstable soon.
I've just noticed that the package FTBFS in experimental in reproducible builds:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > First, are you aware that the experimental packages are much more up-
> > to-date? I would be curious to know whether you can reproduce there
>
> Gentle ping on this?
Sorry, I don't have chroots for
Chris Lamb wrote:
> First, are you aware that the experimental packages are much more up-
> to-date? I would be curious to know whether you can reproduce there
Gentle ping on this?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
Hi Santiago,
> Version: 5:4.0.11-2
First, are you aware that the experimental packages are much more up-
to-date? I would be curious to know whether you can reproduce there as
I am likely to merge that into unstable soon.
> The failures happen randomly. Sometimes it fails, sometimes it does
Package: src:redis
Version: 5:4.0.11-2
Tags: ftbfs
Hello Chris.
I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep
dh_update_autotools_config -i
6 matches
Mail list logo
