On 27.4.2021 2.04, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 23:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello Svante,
For information, your patch got dropped because of #975658
Yes I know since a long time. And you did not care or anybody else
either. So why bother... Why spend time on worthless
Svante Signell, le mar. 27 avril 2021 01:04:30 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 23:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > For information, your patch got dropped because of #975658
>
> Yes I know since a long time.
Ok, I hadn't seen it.
> And you did not care or anybody else either.
Well,
On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 23:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello Svante,
>
> For information, your patch got dropped because of #975658
Yes I know since a long time. And you did not care or anybody else
either. So why bother... Why spend time on worthless issues?
Hello Svante,
For information, your patch got dropped because of #975658
Samuel
Hello,
Svante Signell, le lun. 14 sept. 2020 17:44:24 +0200, a ecrit:
> +#elif defined(__GNU__)
> +#include
> +#include
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NR(n) ((n) & 0xff)
Rather use _IOC_COMMAND, that'll fix it into taking 7 bits only, not 8.
Samuel
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 17:14 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 16.9.2020 10.53, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 23:49 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> > > On 15.9.2020 19.50, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > > Both patches (somewhat modified) submitted upstream to the old
> > > > issues:
> >
On 16.9.2020 10.53, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 23:49 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> On 15.9.2020 19.50, Svante Signell wrote:
>>>
>>> Both patches (somewhat modified) submitted upstream to the old
>>> issues:
>>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/issues/23
>>>
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 23:49 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 15.9.2020 19.50, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > Both patches (somewhat modified) submitted upstream to the old
> > issues:
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/issues/23
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/issues/24
>
On 15.9.2020 19.50, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 20:52 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> On 14.9.2020 18.44, Svante Signell wrote:
>>> found 909436 2.4.102-1
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>> libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd now due to bug #970304 and still
>>> missing support
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 20:52 +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 14.9.2020 18.44, Svante Signell wrote:
> > found 909436 2.4.102-1
> > thanks
> >
> > Hello again,
> >
> > libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd now due to bug #970304 and still
> > missing support for Hurd in drm.h and xf86drm.h. Attached is
On 14.9.2020 18.44, Svante Signell wrote:
> found 909436 2.4.102-1
> thanks
>
> Hello again,
>
> libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd now due to bug #970304 and still missing
> support for Hurd in drm.h and xf86drm.h. Attached is a patch, hurd-
> port.diff, to fix this. The rest of that patch address
found 909436 2.4.102-1
thanks
Hello again,
libdrm still FTBFS on GNU/Hurd now due to bug #970304 and still missing
support for Hurd in drm.h and xf86drm.h. Attached is a patch, hurd-
port.diff, to fix this. The rest of that patch address PATH_MAX issues
in xf86dri.c as PATH_MAX is not defined
12 matches
Mail list logo
