[2019-02-11 19:23] Chris Lamb
>
> part text/plain 414
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> > Yes. Sorry, but I do not understand, how to test tags with severity
> > 'classification'. It seems to not appear in output, that is
> > compared with t/tags/checks/*/tags.
>
> Look at how, for example:
Hi Dmitry,
> Yes. Sorry, but I do not understand, how to test tags with severity
> 'classification'. It seems to not appear in output, that is
> compared with t/tags/checks/*/tags.
Look at how, for example:
t/tags/checks/scripts/scripts-maintainer-script-classification
… works. :)
[2019-02-10 12:46] Chris Lamb
>
> part text/plain 238
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> > +Severity: classification
>
> Replying quickly, excuse terseness; you appear to have removed the
> tests?
Yes. Sorry, but I do not understand, how to test tags with severity
'classification'. It
Hi Dmitry,
> +Severity: classification
Replying quickly, excuse terseness; you appear to have removed the
tests?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
[2019-02-07 16:34] Chris Lamb
> > [Dmitry Bogatov]
> > Sorry, I understood phrase "get numbers" as [...]
>
> I think I've confused you further now, alas. We can use Lintian to
> accurate discover these numbers — my point is basically that it
> cannot be "Severity: wishlist" as this would be
Dmitry,
> > > +Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Again, weren't we just doing this to get numbers at first?
[…]
> Sorry, I understood phrase "get numbers" as
>
> let's create check, set severity to low and see numbers on
> lintial.debian.org
>
> According to codesearch, there is 18
[2019-02-05 18:31] Chris Lamb
>
> part text/plain 432
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> > +Tag: script-uses-unversioned-python-in-shebang
> > +Severity: wishlist
>
> Again, weren't we just doing this to get numbers at first? Unless
> I'm missing something (quite possible!) I do not believe
Hi Dmitry,
> +Tag: script-uses-unversioned-python-in-shebang
> +Severity: wishlist
Again, weren't we just doing this to get numbers at first? Unless
I'm missing something (quite possible!) I do not believe we are at
a point in time where we wish to be implicitly asking maintainers
to "fix" these
* checks/python.desc: Add description for new tag
* checks/python.pm: check shebang of script for references
to unversioned python, either directly or via /usr/bin/env.
* t/tags/tests/python-script-uses-unversioned-python-in-shebang: new
test directory.
---
checks/python.desc
Hi Dmitry,
> +Tag: script-uses-unversioned-python-in-shebang
> +Severity: normal
^^
Hmm, I thought we were just going to use this to see the numbers
rather than ask maintainers to "fix" this?
> +# Check for unversioned python shebang (#909510).
> +for my $file
* checks/python.desc: Add description for new tag
* checks/python.pm: check shebang of script for references
to unversioned python, either directly or via /usr/bin/env.
* t/tags/tests/python-script-uses-unversioned-python-in-shebang: new
test directory.
---
checks/python.desc
11 matches
Mail list logo
