On 3/5/19 11:49 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:35 PM procmem wrote:
>> I stand corrected its in your version since you cherry picked the patch.
> Yes. Could you verify whether that version fixes your issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy Bicha
It does indeed. Thanks.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:35 PM procmem wrote:
> I stand corrected its in your version since you cherry picked the patch.
Yes. Could you verify whether that version fixes your issue?
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
I stand corrected its in your version since you cherry picked the patch.
On 3/5/19 6:16 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I just uploaded libblockdev 2.20-7. Please check if it fixes your issue.
>
> If it does, would you be interested in filing the unblock bug to get
> the fix in to Debian Buster?
>
> https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
I just uploaded libblockdev 2.20-7. Please check if it fixes your issue.
If it does, would you be interested in filing the unblock bug to get
the fix in to Debian Buster?
https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
Jeremy Bicha:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:36 PM procmem wrote:
>> Package: gnome-disk-utility
>> Version: all
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> Hi. I noticed Gnome Disks uses AES-128 by default instead of AES-256
>> like Debian does out of the box. Having 256 bit symmetric keys is good
>> practice for
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:36 PM procmem wrote:
> Package: gnome-disk-utility
> Version: all
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi. I noticed Gnome Disks uses AES-128 by default instead of AES-256
> like Debian does out of the box. Having 256 bit symmetric keys is good
> practice for long term security
Package: gnome-disk-utility
Version: all
Severity: serious
Hi. I noticed Gnome Disks uses AES-128 by default instead of AES-256
like Debian does out of the box. Having 256 bit symmetric keys is good
practice for long term security especially in a coming era of quantum
computers. (Whether they
8 matches
Mail list logo
