On 2024-05-17 Detlef Eppers wrote:
[...]
> So I'm throwing my hat in the ring for gpgme-json :)
[...]
Given that iirc Ubuntu has gone with gpgme-json we will probably go this
avenue, when we package it.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so
On Fri, 17 May 2024 11:36:00 + Detlef Eppers
wrote:
> That said: naming is important and naming is hard, but three years
> have passed, and it is my impression that this is getting somewhat
> out of proportion.
+1
i have been building my own gpgme packages for the last 5+ years
because of
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:16:13 +0200 Norbert Lange
wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:01:37 +0100 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel?=
wrote:
> I have tested https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/merge_requests/1
> and it works fine.
> I would however name the new package gpgme-json, not libgpgme-bin
>
> The
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 02:01:37 +0100 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel?=
wrote:
> I have tested https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/merge_requests/1
> and it works fine.
> I would however name the new package gpgme-json, not libgpgme-bin
>
> The package is only providing gpgme-json(1). If it is going to
I have tested https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/merge_requests/1
and it works fine.
I would however name the new package gpgme-json, not libgpgme-bin
The package is only providing gpgme-json(1). If it is going to ship
more binaries in the future, it can always be replaced. If someone is
On Thu 2020-10-01 14:05:59 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> so far I haven't received any reply to either my pull request or my
> questions in the bug report issue from Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:38:13 +0200.
>
> I would still appreciate input on my work, especially if there is
> anything I need to do to
Hello,
so far I haven't received any reply to either my pull request or my
questions in the bug report issue from Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:38:13 +0200.
I would still appreciate input on my work, especially if there is
anything I need to do to make the changes acceptable for the Debian
package.
Thank
Sascha Wilde writes:
> As a first step I created a merge request to deploy gpgme-json together
> with the library:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/merge_requests/1
After realizing that the current MR breaks multi arch compatibility for
the library I revised it and added a new -bin
Hello,
as promised by Bernhard in his mail we stated to work on this again.
As a first step I created a merge request to deploy gpgme-json together
with the library:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/merge_requests/1
Next I will look into creating specific packages with browser
Hello,
sorry the work from our side got stuck.
We (from Intevation) will be looking into it.
Timeframe: first look next week, fix can take a few more days.
From my rough understanding: The extension ID would need to go into the
personal configuration of the webbrowsers and cannot be configured
Has there been any progress with this bug?
gpgme-json is already built in the Debian sources, so adding it to a
(possibly separate) binary package should not be a big problem. Are
there tests failing or missing?
Best,
Teemu
11 matches
Mail list logo
