On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:06:07PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> FYI : The build did succeed for several platform but unfortunately failed for
> amd64 :-(
Yeah :(
Welcome to experimental ;-)
Builds fine on my system, though. I already did start a build
when you first posted it but then busy
FYI : The build did succeed for several platform but unfortunately failed for
amd64 :-(
- Mail original -
> De: "Emilio Pozuelo Monfort"
> À: "eric valette" , 913...@bugs.debian.org, "Mattia
> Rizzolo"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Novembre 2018 10
On 28/11/2018 10:30, Eric Valette wrote:
> I beg to disagree... But that probably due to experimental version not being
> rebuild.
Indeed. Our transition tooling doesn't track experimental well. I have just
scheduled the python binnmus for the packages that are in experimental. It will
take some
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:30:35AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> I beg to disagree... But that probably due to experimental version not being
> rebuild.
Right, experimental packages are usually not rebuilt during a transition
unless somebody explicitly notice them… Please don't forget to mention
ant to continue? [Y/n] n
Abort.
- Mail original -
> De: "Mattia Rizzolo"
> À: "eric valette" , 913...@bugs.debian.org
> Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Novembre 2018 10:09:45
> Objet: Re: Bug#913069: python-uno is also mising in the transition page
>
> On Wed, Nov 2
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:49:33AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> Currently installing 3.7 removes part of libreoffice due to python-uno. It
> is the single package not rebuild yet on my system.
Yes it is there. It's the source package libreoffice, which is in the
tracker. And actually, it's
Currently installing 3.7 removes part of libreoffice due to python-uno.
It is the single package not rebuild yet on my system.
-- eric
7 matches
Mail list logo
