Bug#913120: cups-filters: please favor graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat over imagemagick

2018-11-11 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Control: tags -1 +pending Le mercredi, 7 novembre 2018, 23.40:23 h CET Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Mmm, actually it's even a very specific case of braille embossing, which > is really not common, and most probably really never used in networked > situations. Perhaps we could just demote to

Bug#913120: cups-filters: please favor graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat over imagemagick

2018-11-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Moritz Mühlenhoff, le mer. 07 nov. 2018 23:04:55 +0100, a ecrit: > In this specific case other, more promising hardening options would be: > - IM is only used for the braille support, so this could be split into > a separate binary package, reducing the attack footprint for the

Bug#913120: cups-filters: please favor graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat over imagemagick

2018-11-07 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 08:44:25AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Source: cups-filters > Version: 1.21.3-2 > Severity: important > Tags: security > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Graphicsmagick is a drop-in replacement for imagemagick which - apart > from being faster

Bug#913120: cups-filters: please favor graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat over imagemagick

2018-11-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Source: cups-filters Version: 1.21.3-2 Severity: important Tags: security -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Graphicsmagick is a drop-in replacement for imagemagick which - apart from being faster and lighter - also claims that it "suffers from fewer security issues and exploits" -