Built fine I have not yet tested against moonshot
On December 3, 2018 8:52:10 AM EST, "Cantor, Scott" wrote:
>On 12/1/18, 4:48 AM, "Pkg-shibboleth-devel on behalf of wf...@niif.hu"
>on behalf of wf...@niif.hu> wrote:
>
>> Please let me know if you need any help; for example I can see that
>>
On 12/1/18, 4:48 AM, "Pkg-shibboleth-devel on behalf of wf...@niif.hu"
wrote:
> Please let me know if you need any help; for example I can see that
> version 3 of the resolver uses pkg-config for finding the SP, which is
> cool in principle but nobody tested it in Debian yet, so that may
>
Sam Hartman writes:
> Don't wait for me on shibboleth-resolver or moonshot-gss-eap to file the
> removal requests.
> They are both basically broken in unstable, so there's no reason to
> block.
Hi,
Removal requests filed.
Please let me know if you need any help; for example I can see that
Don't wait for me on shibboleth-resolver or moonshot-gss-eap to file the
removal requests.
They are both basically broken in unstable, so there's no reason to
block.
peter green writes:
> I then had a poke around and noticed that an "opensaml" source package
> had recently been uploaded that seems to have taken over most of the
> binary package names from opensaml2. If the intention is for opensaml
> to replace opensaml2 can you file a removal request?
Hi,
Package: opensaml2
Version: 2.6.1-1
opensaml2 FTBFS with the new xmltooling. I tried to fix it but I ran into error
after error and eventually gave up.
I then had a poke around and noticed that an "opensaml" source package had
recently been uploaded that seems to have taken over most of the
6 matches
Mail list logo