* Apollon Oikonomopoulos:
> What this section says (at least to my eyes), is that the SSPL requires
> *all software* interfacing with MongoDB to form a "service" to be
> licensed under the SSPL too. This is a much broader restriction than
> linking, but still does not seem to violate DFSG #9. I
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Please elaborate what is the relevant difference that makes the AGPL
> DFSG-free but SSPL v1 not.
I understand the motivation behind this request but as this has been
somewhat discussed ad-nauseum elsewhere on the internet and I would
not wish to condescend Hideki, Apollon o
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:42:27 +0100
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Before I expound on this topic, are you already acquainted with the
> general concerns raised about this license outside of Debian? I would
> not with to patronise you by repeating them to you here.
Not at all.
> (Just another brief cl
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:48:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>...
> However, the SSPL is clearly not in the sprit of the DFSG, yet alone
> complimentary to the Debian's goals of promoting software or user
> freedom.
>...
You are treating "make it easy to build proprietary services o
Hideki,
> Could you explain it a bit more, please? Why SSPL doesn't meet our
> goal? I don't complain about this judge but more detailed explanation
> with some examples is better, IMHO.
Before I expound on this topic, are you already acquainted with the
general concerns raised about this lice
Hi,
On Wed, 05 Dec 2018 04:44:39 -0500 "Chris Lamb " wrote:
> As you have discovered, it is difficult to point towards a clear-cut
> violation of the DFSG that we could all agree on due to both legal and
> language fuzziness. However, even if we could, there is always a
> slight tendency to treat
Chris Lamb wrote:
> In light of this, the Project does not consider that software licensed
> under the SSPL to be suitable for inclusion in the Debian archive.
For the avoidance of doubt:
* This statement accidentally omitted a restriction/reference to the
the "main" [0] archive component.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
[ Continuing the thread in debian-legal[0] and Cc'ing debian-legal as
well ]
Dear FTP masters,
I would like your opinion on whether MongoDB's new SSPL license is
suitable for inclusion in the main archive. To give a bit of background,
MongoDB was pre
8 matches
Mail list logo
