Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"

tags 916023 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/39677e34f24ecde995586d39765b5f08b4068787 checks/files.pm| 5 - collection/file-info | 3 +-- debian/changelog | 6 ++

Bug#916023: lintian: package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files should use file type (was: "Re: Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"")

retitle 916023 lintian: package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files should use file type severity 916023 wishlist thanks Hi Dmitry, >This check is only about file names. According to this logic, >anything outsite of /usr/share is arch-dependent. Ah yes I see; you ship a Python script at

Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"

[2018-12-09 23:35] Chris Lamb > > please add check, that binary package could have "Architecture: all" > > instead of "any". > > Hm, is this not the (experimental): > > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files.html > > … tag? :) As of my version of

Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"

tags 916023 + moreinfo thanks Hi Dmitry, > please add check, that binary package could have "Architecture: all" > instead of "any". Hm, is this not the (experimental): https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files.html … tag? :) Best wishes, -- ,''`.

Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.116 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, please add check, that binary package could have "Architecture: all" instead of "any". See #915976 for example. I believe checking that none of files in package have ELF magic is quite reliable.