Hi,
>The patch is basically replacing the getdents64 syscall by the getdents
>one. This means that applying this patch would make debian differ with
>regards to other distributions in the syscalls that are used for the
>same binaries. In turns it is likely going to affect binaries that are
>using
Hi,
On 2020-09-17 21:44, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hello glibc maintainers,
>
> would you please consider including this patch to unbreak things
> (fix a regression) until the triangle between qemu, Linux and glibc
> has figured out how to best deal with it?
The patch is basically replacing the
Hello glibc maintainers,
would you please consider including this patch to unbreak things
(fix a regression) until the triangle between qemu, Linux and glibc
has figured out how to best deal with it?
Thanks,
//mirabilos
--
you introduced a merge commit│ % g rebase -i HEAD^^
sorry, no
Source: glibc
Version: 2.28-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
Hi!
In 298d0e3129c0b5137f4989275b13fe30d0733c4d ("Consolidate Linux getdents{64}
implementation"), upstream made changes to the getdents{64} implementation
which breaks glibc on
4 matches
Mail list logo
