Am 16.04.20 um 17:18 schrieb Bernhard Schmidt:
Am 16.04.20 um 17:11 schrieb sauro...@gmx.de:
Hi,
Well at least i thought that this would let me on Squeeze, but i was wrong
Could you please rephrase your question?
BTW, Squeeze is Debian 6 and out of LTS since 2016. I assume you mean
Am 16.04.20 um 17:11 schrieb sauro...@gmx.de:
Hi,
> Well at least i thought that this would let me on Squeeze, but i was wrong
Could you please rephrase your question?
BTW, Squeeze is Debian 6 and out of LTS since 2016. I assume you mean
Stretch aka Debian 9?
Bernhard
Well at least i thought that this would let me on Squeeze, but i was wrong.
I´ve did the upgrade to Buster today now on two machines, both with the
following result.
After upgrading freeradius wouldn´t start, so i looked into it and found
out that somehow the folder:
Am 15.04.20 um 13:57 schrieb sauro...@gmx.de:
Hi,
>> > "Michael" == Michael Stapelberg writes:
>> I really don't think I'm going to be able to provide more on this prior
>> to the buster release. I'm struggling trying to get through my own list
>> of things to fix in my packages.
> Is there
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 08:48:03 -0500 Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael Stapelberg writes:
> I really don't think I'm going to be able to provide more on this prior
> to the buster release. I'm struggling trying to get through my own list
> of things to fix in my packages.
>
Is there
control: tags -1 help
> "Michael" == Michael Stapelberg writes:
Michael>Can you send a patch please? Its been like
Michael> that since before I touched the package.
My suspicion is that it's removing parts of a patch. In fact, it looks
like most of what's needed is to remove
Can you send a patch please? It’s been like that since before I touched the
package.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:39 PM Sam Hartman wrote:
> package: freeradius
> tags: security
> version: 3.0.17+dfsg-1
> severity: important
> justification: Inappropriately broad default authorization
>
> The
7 matches
Mail list logo
