Sorry, last mail should have gone to bug 922112 and have been a real
bounce so that it is clear that it is from Jens. Somehow the initial
bounce did not appear on bug 922112 so far.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Martin
gt; > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:34:13 +
> > From: MJ Ray
> > To: debian-le...@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: Bug#919356: dwarves-dfsg: Copyright/licensing is unclear
> >
> >
> > Domenico Andreoli skribis:
&g
> Subject: Re: Bug#919356: dwarves-dfsg: Copyright/licensing is unclear
>
>
> Domenico Andreoli skribis:
>
> > the situation of dwarves-dfsg improved a lot over the weekend, the
> > only knot left is now the license of hash.h
> >
> > This file is also pr
Missed the bug off the CC for this. Sorry.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:34:13 +
From: MJ Ray
To: debian-le...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#919356: dwarves-dfsg: Copyright/licensing is unclear
Domenico Andreoli skribis:
> the situation of dwarves-d
Hallo d-l,
the situation of dwarves-dfsg improved a lot over the weekend, the
only knot left is now the license of hash.h
This file is also present in the kernel [0] with an updated copyright
but still without license.
I received a private email from somebody in the kernel community who
alread
Package: dwarves-dfsg
Severity: grave
This file is without license info:
- hash.h
These are also without copyright info:
- btf_encoder.c
- btf_encoder.h
- ctf.h
- libbtf.c
- libbtf.h
- libctf.c
- libctf.h
Though the detailed analysis is not yet complete, it's clear that the
copyright/l
6 matches
Mail list logo
