Quoting Andreas Henriksson (2020-07-12 18:40:57)
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 05:39:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I understand that neither you nor Andreas consider current release of
> > IWD a _recommended_ alternative for wpa-supplicant. That is a good
> > reason to not depend on or
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 05:39:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I understand that neither you nor Andreas consider current release of
> IWD a _recommended_ alternative for wpa-supplicant. That is a good
> reason to not depend on or recommend iwd.
I think iwd itself (since >= 1.2,
Quoting Michael Biebl (2020-07-04 00:42:57)
> Am 04.07.20 um 00:16 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Then how about _not_ recommend iwd but just lower from depending on
> > wpasupplicant to only recommending it. Because that's what it is:
> > Recommended for all except special situations. For
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 04.07.20 um 00:16 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Then how about _not_ recommend iwd but just lower from depending on
> > wpasupplicant to only recommending it. Because that's what it is:
> > Recommended for all except special
Am 04.07.20 um 00:16 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> Then how about _not_ recommend iwd but just lower from depending on
> wpasupplicant to only recommending it. Because that's what it is:
> Recommended for all except special situations. For now... Right?
Hm, no. That's exactly the situation I
5 matches
Mail list logo
