Hi Emmanuel, Niels,

Any input on this topic?

Thanks in advance,

_g.

-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : Re: Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented
uses packages in the unnamed module)
Date : Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:58:08 +0100
De : Gilles Filippini <p...@debian.org>
Pour : 919...@bugs.debian.org, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
<paul...@debian.org>, Santiago Vila <sanv...@debian.org>

Hi,

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 13:28:57 +0800 "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)"
<paul...@debian.org> wrote:
> Santiago Vila 於 2019/1/20 上午1:35 寫道:
> > Package: src:libjstun-java
> > Version: 0.7.3+dfsg-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > 
> > Dear maintainer:
> > 
> > I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [...]
> >  debian/rules build-indep
> > dh build-indep --with javahelper
> >    dh_update_autotools_config -i
> >    jh_linkjars -i
> >    jh_build -i
> > find src/de -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0 
> > /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javac -g -cp 
> > /usr/share/java/slf4j-jdk14.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j-api.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:debian/_jh_build.libjstun-java
> >  -d debian/_jh_build.libjstun-java -source 1.7 -target 1.7 -encoding 
> > ISO8859-1
> > warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 
> > 7
> > Note: src/de/javawi/jstun/test/demo/ice/ICENegociator.java uses unchecked 
> > or unsafe operations.
> > Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
> > 1 warning
> > find src/de -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0 
> > /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javadoc -locale en_US -link 
> > /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api -link 
> > /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api -classpath 
> > /usr/share/java/slf4j-jdk14.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j-api.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:debian/_jh_build.libjstun-java
> >  -d debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api -quiet -encoding ISO8859-1 -notimestamp 
> > -source 1.7
> > Creating destination directory: "debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api/"
> > javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed 
> > module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are 
> > in named modules.
> > javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed 
> > module, but the packages defined in 
> > /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api/ are in named modules.
> > 2 errors
> > make: *** [debian/rules:11: build-indep] Error 123
> > dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep subprocess returned exit 
> > status 2
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > (The above is just how the builds ends and not necessarily the most 
> > relevant part)
> > 
> > The build was made in my autobuilder with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
> > and it also fails here:
> > 
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libjstun-java.html
> > 
> > where you can get a full build log if you need it.
> > 
> > If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign 
> > and affects,
> > so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> 
> Hi Santiago,
> 
> It seems to me that this line causes the problem.
> find src/de -name *.java -and -type f -print0 | xargs -s 512000 -0
> /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javadoc -locale en_US -link
> /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api -link
> /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api -classpath
> /usr/share/java/slf4j-jdk14.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j-api.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:debian/_jh_build.libjstun-java
> -d debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api -quiet -encoding ISO8859-1 -notimestamp
> -source 1.7
> 
> But if remove "-link /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api -link
> /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api", then it will pass.
> 
> I'm wondering if javahelper needs to call javadoc in different way.

I've got the very same result for #919803 affecting src:mac-widgets.

Thanks,

_g.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to