Bug#919802: Bug#919803: Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-29 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 29.01.19 um 23:09 schrieb Santiago Vila: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:00:25PM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: > >> No, this is a misunderstanding: the code snippet above scans >> Build-Depends* fields from debian/control. If default-jdk-doc is >> installed but not referenced in Build-Depends*,

Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-29 Thread Gilles Filippini
Santiago Vila a écrit le 29/01/2019 à 22:55 : > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 09:44:40PM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: > >> Looking at the jh_build code, the list of -link javadoc options is >> constructed from this snippet: >>CLASSPATHDOCS="`for i in $(grep-dctrl --no-field-names --show-field

Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-29 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:00:25PM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: > No, this is a misunderstanding: the code snippet above scans > Build-Depends* fields from debian/control. If default-jdk-doc is > installed but not referenced in Build-Depends*, then the package will > build fine. I've tested

Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-29 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 09:44:40PM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Looking at the jh_build code, the list of -link javadoc options is > constructed from this snippet: >CLASSPATHDOCS="`for i in $(grep-dctrl --no-field-names --show-field > Build-Depends,Build-Depends-Indep -F source "$pkg"

Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-29 Thread Gilles Filippini
Hi, Gilles Filippini a écrit le 21/01/2019 à 16:58 : > Hi, > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 13:28:57 +0800 "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" > wrote: >> Santiago Vila 於 2019/1/20 上午1:35 寫道: >>> Package: src:libjstun-java >>> Version: 0.7.3+dfsg-1 >>> Severity: serious >>> Tags: ftbfs >>> >>> Dear maintainer:

Bug#919802: Fwd: Re: Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-21 Thread Gilles Filippini
Hi Emmanuel, Niels, Any input on this topic? Thanks in advance, _g. Message transféré Sujet : Re: Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module) Date : Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:58:08 +0100 De : Gilles Filippini Pour : 919

Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-21 Thread Gilles Filippini
Hi, On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 13:28:57 +0800 "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" wrote: > Santiago Vila 於 2019/1/20 上午1:35 寫道: > > Package: src:libjstun-java > > Version: 0.7.3+dfsg-1 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: ftbfs > > > > Dear maintainer: > > > > I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:

Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-19 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
Santiago Vila 於 2019/1/20 上午1:35 寫道: > Package: src:libjstun-java > Version: 0.7.3+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear maintainer: > > I tried to build this package in buster but it failed: > > >

Bug#919802: libjstun-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-01-19 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:libjstun-java Version: 0.7.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in buster but it failed: [...] debian/rules build-indep dh build-indep --with