Bug#920286: gcc-8: Missing conflict/break with binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu:i386 can lead to broken compiler

2019-03-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 15:41 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: [...] > src:linux Build-Depends binutils-. The binutils patch will > render these dependencies cross-unsatisfiable. They will need to be > switched to binutils-for-host or annotated with :any (after checking > that it doesn't use plugins). Mai

Bug#920286: gcc-8: Missing conflict/break with binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu:i386 can lead to broken compiler

2019-03-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 04:38:19PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Ultimately, this means that marking binutils- M-A:foreign was > wrong. It means that binutils plays the same role as ruby, perl, python > and even make: you can load shared objects into it, but much of the time > you don't. All of the

Bug#920286: gcc-8: Missing conflict/break with binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu:i386 can lead to broken compiler

2019-01-24 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi, On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 05:52:19PM +0100, Amaury Pouly wrote: > Probably gcc-8 should be in conflict with binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu:i386 > because > of the following chain of events: > - install an unstable amd64 system > - enable multiarch i386 > - install gcc-8 > - install binutils-x86-64-l

Bug#920286: gcc-8: Missing conflict/break with binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu:i386 can lead to broken compiler

2019-01-23 Thread Amaury Pouly
Package: gcc-8 Version: 8.2.0-14 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Probably gcc-8 should be in conflict with binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu:i386 because of the following chain of events: - install an unstable amd64 system - enable multiarch i386 - install gcc-8 - install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu:i