On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 01:24:34PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Josh Triplett:
> > I've submitted a debian-policy patch to document it.
>
> Amazing! :)
Bug 920692 against policy, if you'd be interested in seconding the
proposal.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:57:56PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> (We should have a goal of not shipping ANY file in /var/, full stop.)
Agreed, but that (and /etc) are much, much larger propositions, while
/var/cache is already done at this point.
On Jan 28, intrigeri wrote:
> The initial request by Marco about CACHEDIR.TAG was "please ship
> a CACHEDIR.TAG file in the apparmor package if the cache directory
> cannot be moved out of /etc/" (#883584). Now that we've moved the
> cache to /var/cache, I agree we can stop shipping CACHEDIR.TAG
Josh Triplett:
> I've submitted a debian-policy patch to document it.
Amazing! :)
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:27:09PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Josh Triplett:
> > apparmor ships /var/cache/apparmor/CACHEDIR.TAG directly in the binary
> > package. Packages must not ship files or directories in /var/cache; the
> > system administrator is free to delete such files or directories at
Hi Josh & Marco,
Josh Triplett:
> apparmor ships /var/cache/apparmor/CACHEDIR.TAG directly in the binary
> package. Packages must not ship files or directories in /var/cache; the
> system administrator is free to delete such files or directories at any
> time.
Just curious (since I agree with you
Source: apparmor
Severity: normal
apparmor ships /var/cache/apparmor/CACHEDIR.TAG directly in the binary
package. Packages must not ship files or directories in /var/cache; the
system administrator is free to delete such files or directories at any
time.
In this case, it's the responsibility of t
7 matches
Mail list logo
