Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:04:16 -0500 Antoine Beaupré
wrote:
> It should be noted this is a SHOULD NOT and not a MUST NOT, so it's a
> little more relaxed
Hence I downgrade the severity. I still like this to get fixed to avoid
the unnecessary copies kept around
Control: tags -1 buster-ignore
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 12:54:59PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> It's true, however, that the Debian policy specifies built-using is for
> copyright reasons.
Please note that policy says 'license or DFSG requirements to provide full
source
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 04:09, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2019-02-03 17:21:35, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> > My first submissions for the dmarc-cat package (#920385) were refused
> > by the FTP masters because the built-using field did not respect §7.8
> > of the Debian policy.
>
> That's actually
On 2019-02-03 17:21:35, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> My first submissions for the dmarc-cat package (#920385) were refused
> by the FTP masters because the built-using field did not respect §7.8
> of the Debian policy.
That's actually inaccurate: the package was refused because the
dependencies
Package: dh-golang
Version: 1.39
Severity: serious
My first submissions for the dmarc-cat package (#920385) were refused
by the FTP masters because the built-using field did not respect §7.8
of the Debian policy. Extract from #debian-ftp:
16:55:59 Built-Using is only meant to be used when the
5 matches
Mail list logo
