Hello,
Missatge de Jonathan Wiltshire del dia dg., 17 de
març 2019 a les 19:04:
>
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 11:51:45PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> > OK, I tried, and to be honest, stable isn't perfect either, since
> > distro lifecycle is longer than
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 11:51:45PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> OK, I tried, and to be honest, stable isn't perfect either, since
> distro lifecycle is longer than application support, so not allowing
> newer upstream versions in stable is problematic security wise in
Hello again,
Besides what was mentioned in the previous email, I would like to clarify
that we commit to open-build-service active maintenance since it is used in
production by us.
Regarding security we have already discussed with security team adding a
note in the package clarifying
Hello,
Missatge de Jonathan Wiltshire del dia dc., 6 de març
2019 a les 22:59:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:19:10PM +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote:
> > A lot of effort has been put into `open-build-service`, since ruby rails
> > 5 transition needed to happen and it did. Even uploading the
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:19:10PM +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote:
> A lot of effort has been put into `open-build-service`, since ruby rails
> 5 transition needed to happen and it did. Even uploading the package
> on-time it was delayed due to a couple dependencies:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package open-build-service
A lot of effort has been put into `open-build-service`, since ruby rails 5
transition needed to happen and it did. Even uploading the package
6 matches
Mail list logo
