Bug#922557: lintian: Make orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature a "dsc" check (was: "Re: Bug#922557: lintian: Please check whether there's an expected orig tarball signature")

Hi Guillem, > > Assuming that is why Guillem did not see it I am renaming this bug > > to match. There is no reason why it cannot be a .changes check; […] > As Mattia mentions, that's the other way around. (I don't have that message, and nor does the BTS...?) > The .dsc always get all files

Bug#922557: lintian: Make orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature a "dsc" check (was: "Re: Bug#922557: lintian: Please check whether there's an expected orig tarball signature")

Hi! On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 14:51:42 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > There is already such a tag, orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature. > > That's a .changes checks, not a .dsc one, so it would be emitted only > > for -1. Right, had seen it but from a very quick skim got the impression it was for

Bug#922557: lintian: Make orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature a "dsc" check (was: "Re: Bug#922557: lintian: Please check whether there's an expected orig tarball signature")

retitle 922557 lintian: Make orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature a "dsc" check thanks Hi Mattia, > There is already such a tag, orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature. > That's a .changes checks, not a .dsc one, so it would be emitted only > for -1. Assuming that is why Guillem did not