-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 14:02 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> That also does not replace light-locker. It only enables locking in default
> installations in the above scenarios.
We're running in circle. I already said no (not now, at least).
Regards,
>> The attached patch uses xfce4-screensaver only if lightdm is not
>available, as in situations already described.
>
>I know (I already did the patch actually, and just pushed it). My
>answer was
>about the dependency part.
That also does not replace light-locker. It only enables locking in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 13:43 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> > I'm not sure at all I want to actually replace lightdm/light-locker by
> > xfce4-
> > screensaver.
>
> Noone requested that.
>
> The attached patch uses xfce4-screensaver only if lightdm
Hi,
>I'm not sure at all I want to actually replace lightdm/light-locker by
>xfce4-
>screensaver.
Noone requested that.
The attached patch uses xfce4-screensaver only if lightdm is not available, as
in situations already described.
-nik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 21:54 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 screen locking does not work without lightdm
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> > In xflock4, please support xfce4-screensaver, which is a mate-screensaver
> > fork
Control: retitle -1 screen locking does not work without lightdm
Control: severity -1 important
> In xflock4, please support xfce4-screensaver, which is a mate-screensaver
> fork targeted at Xfce4 integration.
>
> If installed, it should get the same priority as mate-screensaver (probably
> one
Package: xfce4-session
Version: 4.12.1-6
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/xflock4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
In xflock4, please support xfce4-screensaver, which is a mate-screensaver
fork targeted at Xfce4 integration.
If installed, it should get the same priority as
7 matches
Mail list logo
