Bug#923240: policykit-1: Please support alternative logind implementations

2019-08-11 Thread Mark Hindley
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Yes. I will add that to the description. The one exception is sd_is_mq() as > > upstream has excluded POSIX message queues from the implementation. > > I think that's probably fine - I suspect the original implementation in >

Bug#923240: policykit-1: Please support alternative logind implementations

2019-08-11 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 16:56:17 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 01:09:33PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I hope sd-daemon(3) is also implemented? Before it was absorbed into > > libsystemd, that used to be a "copylib" intended to be pasted into portable > > software like

Bug#923240: policykit-1: Please support alternative logind implementations

2019-08-11 Thread Mark Hindley
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 01:09:33PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I hope sd-daemon(3) is also implemented? Before it was absorbed into > libsystemd, that used to be a "copylib" intended to be pasted into portable > software like dbus-daemon - so hopefully it's still usable as a standalone >

Bug#923240: policykit-1: Please support alternative logind implementations

2019-08-11 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 10:50:18 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Sorry for the delay in getting back to you on this. Non-critical changes > > to important components like policykit-1 did not seem like a

Bug#923240: policykit-1: Please support alternative logind implementations

2019-08-11 Thread Mark Hindley
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:50:18AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > > When a bug is reported in policykit-1 on a system that is using elogind, > > does the reportbug-generated message template indicate that? Is there > > someone among the elogind maintainers who can help with such bugs if > > they

Bug#923240: policykit-1: Please support alternative logind implementations

2019-08-10 Thread Mark Hindley
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Simon, Many thanks for this. On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:58:49 +, Mark Hindley wrote: > > For desktops to be installable on such systems, policykit-1 needs to depend

Bug#923240: policykit-1: Please support alternative logind implementations

2019-08-09 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:58:49 +, Mark Hindley wrote: > For desktops to be installable on such systems, policykit-1 needs to depend on > the newly approved virtual packages default-logind and logind. In the latest > upload of src:systemd, libpam-systemd provides

Bug#923240: policykit-1: Please support alternative logind implementations

2019-02-25 Thread Mark Hindley
Package: policykit-1 Version: 0.105-25 Severity: important Tags: patch Dear Maintainers, elogind is an alternative Dbus login1 implementation for systems not running systemd as pid 1. It is in buster. For desktops to be installable on such systems, policykit-1 needs to depend on the newly